Skip to content
Spellwright News

Benchmarks

AutomationBench-AA

AutomationBench-AA

Other · higher is better · 2 models
  1. Gemini 4 Hydrogen76.1%*
  2. Claude Sonnet 5.571.8%

Every result

  • Gemini 4 Hydrogen76.1%Reported by the model's maker (Artificial Analysis leaderboard, as cited by Google), Nov 12, 2026

    Google reports 76.1% for Gemini 4 Hydrogen on AutomationBench-AA, citing the Artificial Analysis leaderboard.

    Tasks: Artificial Analysis version of AutomationBench, as Google labels it.

    Setting: Google says its results use the Gemini API at the highest thinking setting (xhigh for Hydrogen) unless noted; no numeric budget is stated.

    Limits: Provider-reported: Google publishes the result for its own model; it has not been independently reproduced here. Google says this score comes from a third-party leaderboard; that leaderboard was not opened here, so its run date, harness and settings are unverified. Kept apart from the AutomationBench chart, whose Gemini scores Google sourced from Zapier's leaderboard; whether the two runs use the same tasks was not established. Google says the scores are as of November 2026 for the model it calls Gemini 4 Hydrogen; equivalence to the build now served on every surface is not established. Results under the same benchmark name can be shown together as reported scores, but unmatched settings and missing methods rule out a controlled ranking.

    Google DeepMind · Google DeepMind · Google DeepMind · Google DeepMind · Google

  • Claude Sonnet 5.571.8%Independent evaluation (Artificial Analysis leaderboard, as cited by Google), Nov 12, 2026

    Google's Gemini 4 Hydrogen comparison table lists 71.8% for Claude Sonnet 5.5 on AutomationBench-AA, citing the Artificial Analysis leaderboard.

    Tasks: Artificial Analysis version of AutomationBench, as Google labels it.

    Setting: Google says it reports the maximum thinking setting available for Sonnet 5.5, or the best available result when that is not reported; no numeric budget is stated.

    Limits: Third-party report: Google, a competing model maker, published this figure for Anthropic's model in its own comparison table. Google reports this result for another maker's model in its Gemini 4 Hydrogen comparison table; it was not checked against that maker's or the leaderboard's own page. Results under the same benchmark name can be shown together as reported scores, but unmatched settings and missing methods rule out a controlled ranking.

    Google DeepMind · Google DeepMind · Google DeepMind · Google DeepMind

No published AutomationBench-AA score checked yet for: Gemini 4 Carbon, Claude Fable 5.2, Claude Mythos 5.2, Gemini 4 Argon, Claude Opus 5.5, Claude Opus 5, Claude Sonnet 5, Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental (March 2025), Gemini 2.0 Flash (December 2024 experimental), Qwen2.5-7B, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, GPT-4o mini (July 2024 release).