Skip to content
Spellwright News

Benchmarks

SWE-sweep

SWE-sweep

Coding · higher is better · 1 model

These reports don't say how many tries each model got per problem, so the scores may not be comparable.

  1. Claude Sonnet 5.53.1%

Every result

  • Claude Sonnet 5.53.1%Reported by the benchmark's authors (Official SWE-sweep public leaderboard, as cited by Google), Nov 12, 2026

    Google's Gemini 4 Hydrogen comparison table lists 3.1% for Claude Sonnet 5.5 on SWE-sweep, taken from the official public leaderboard.

    Tasks: Subtask-weighted reward, as Google reports it.

    Setting: Google says it reports the maximum thinking setting available for Sonnet 5.5, or the best available result when that is not reported; no numeric budget is stated.

    Limits: Third-party report: Google, a competing model maker, published this figure for Anthropic's model in its own comparison table. Who ran the leaderboard entry was not checked. Google reports this result for another maker's model in its Gemini 4 Hydrogen comparison table; it was not checked against that maker's or the leaderboard's own page. Results under the same benchmark name can be shown together as reported scores, but unmatched settings and missing methods rule out a controlled ranking.

    Google DeepMind · Google DeepMind · Google DeepMind · Google DeepMind

No published SWE-sweep score checked yet for: Gemini 4 Hydrogen, Gemini 4 Carbon, Claude Fable 5.2, Claude Mythos 5.2, Gemini 4 Argon, Claude Opus 5.5, Claude Opus 5, Claude Sonnet 5, Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental (March 2025), Gemini 2.0 Flash (December 2024 experimental), Qwen2.5-7B, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct.